Gloves of Ice or Free Hands? A Nomadic Reading of Rudolf Steiner and Bergson and Deleuze and Others on Knowledge as Nonrepresentational and the Importance of Aesthesis…

Bo Dahlin

Abstract


This paper explores the educational significance of the philosophical critique of knowledge as a reproductive representation of reality. As it includes the notion of non-representational knowledge, Rudolf Steiner’s epistemology is introduced and further linked to elements in Henri Bergson and Gilles Deleuze. Wilhelm von Humboldt’s idea of Menschenbildung as the central function of knowledge is brought in. Humboldt and Steiner both emphasise knowledge as mediating the interplay between self and world, producing a deeper sense of reality. For education this means that teaching must respect the living nature of genuine concepts, as well as the aesthetic and “suffering” aspects of learning. Horst Rumpf has eloquently argued for the latter. In conclusion, some traits of Steiner’s pedagogy are presented as possible practical implications.



Keywords


educational philosophy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, W. T. (1992). Reality isn’t what it used to be: Theatrical politics, ready-to-wear religion, global myths, primitive chic and other wonders of the postmodern world. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

Bergson, H. (1992). The creative mind: An introduction to metaphysics. New York: Carol Publishing Group.

Boundas, C. V. (1996). Deleuze-Bergson: An ontology of the virtual. In P. Patton (Ed.), Deleuze: A critical reader (pp. 81-106). Oxford: Blackwell.

Bruford, W. H. (2009). The German tradition of self-cultivation. ‘Bildung’ from Humboldt to Thomas Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bryden, M. (Ed.). (2001). Deleuze and religion. London and New York: Routledge.

Dahlin, B. (2001). The primacy of cognition—or of perception? A phenomenological critique of the theoretical bases of science education. Science & Education, 10(5), 453-475.

Dahlin, B. (2009). On the path towards thinking: Learning from Martin Heidegger and Rudolf Steiner. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(6), 537-554.

Dahlin, B. (2013). A critical view of Heiner Ullrich’s critique of Rudolf Steiner’s philosophy of knowledge. RoSE: Research on Steiner Education, 4(1), 202-207.

Dahlin, B., Östergaard, E., & Hugo, A. (2009). An argument for reversing the bases of science education—A phenomenological alternative to cognitionism. NorDiNa, 5(2), 185-199.

Deleuze, G. (1988). Bergsonism. New York: Zone.

Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image. London: Athlone Press.

Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. New York: Zone Books.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.

Douglass, P. (1999). Bergson and cinema: Friends or foes? In J. Mullarkey (Ed.), The new Bergson (pp. 209-228). Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.

Foster, R. (2011). An Adornian theory of recognition? A critical response to Axel Honneth’s Reification: A new look at an old idea. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19(2), 255-265.

Girod, M. (2007). A conceptual overview of the role of beauty and aesthetics in science and science education. Studies in Science Education, 43(1), 38-61.

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

Gough, N. (2006). Shaking the tree, making a rhizome: Towards a nomadic geophilosophy of science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 625-645.

Hanegraaff, W. J. (2008). Altered states of knowledge: The attainment of Gnōsis in the Hermetica. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 2(2), 128-163.

Humboldt, W. von. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lovat, T., & Semetsky, I. (2009). Practical mysticism and Deleuze’s ontology of virtuality. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 5(2), 236-248.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception. Evanston: Northwestern UP.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1992). The phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.

Moulard-Leonard, V. (2008). Bergson – Deleuze encounters. Transcendental experience and the thought of the virtual. New York: SUNY Press.

Mullarkey, J. (Ed.). (1999). The new Bergson. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.

Muschalle, M. (2001-2005). Zum Wirklichkeitsbegriff Rudolf Steiners. Retrieved 2011-08-24: http://www.studienzuranthroposophie.de

Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2008). The emergent curriculum: Navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 313-328.

Robinson, K. (Ed.). (2009). Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson: Rhizomatic Connections. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rooth-Bernstein, R. (1997). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In A. I. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 49-82). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

Rorty, R. (1993). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rumpf, H. (1987). Belebungsversuche: Ausgrabungen gegen die Verödung der Lernkultur. Weinheim: Juventa. [Attempts of vivification: Excavations against the erosion of the learning culture.]

Rumpf, H. (2010). Was hätte Einstein gedacht, wenn er nicht Geige gespielt hätte? Gegen die Verkürzungen des etablierten Lernbegriffs. Weinheim & München: Juventa Verlag. [What would Einstein have thought, had he not played the violin? Against the reductions of the established learning concept.]

Semetsky, I. (2007). Educating for 3C: Critical, clinical, creative. Paper presented at the Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia, Conference, 2007. Retrieved from: www.scribd.com [Access date 2013-05-17].

Semetsky, I. (2009). Deleuze as a philosopher of education: Affective knowledge/effective learning. The European Legacy, 14(4), 443-456.

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.

Smith, D. W. (2001). The doctrine of univocity: Deleuze's ontology of immanence. In M. Bryden (Ed.), Deleuze and religion (pp. 167-183). London and New York: Routledge.

Spaemann, R. (1987/88). Erziehung zur Wirklichkeit. Scheidewege, 17, 136-146. [Education to reality.]

Spaemann, R. (2001). Über den Mut zur Erziehung, in R. Spaemann, Grenzen. Zur ethischen Dimension des Handelns (pp. 490-502). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. [About the courage to educate. Orig. publ. 1978]

Steiner, R. (1980). Wahrheit und Wissenschaft. Vorspiel einer «Philosophie der Freiheit». Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag. [Truth and science. Prelude to a philosophy of freedom.]

Steiner, R. (1984). Philosophie und Anthroposophie 1904-1923. Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag. [Philosophy and anthroposophy 1904-1923.]

Steiner, R. (1985). Friedrich Nietzsche: Fighter for freedom. Blauvelt, NY: Garber Communications Inc.

Steiner, R. (1986). Die Beantwortung von Welt—und Lebensfragen—durch Anthroposophie. Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag. [The answer to world—and life—questions through anthroposophy.]

Steiner, R. (1991). Die Pädagogische Praxis vom Gesichtspunkte geisteswissenschaftlicher Menschenerkenntnis. Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag. [Pedagogical practice from the perspective of spiritual scientific knowledge of the human being.]

Steiner, R. (1992). Wie erlangt man erkentnisse der höheren Welten? Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag. [How to achieve knowledge of higher worlds?]

Steiner, R. (1993). Die Stufen der höheren Erkenntnis. Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag. [The stages of higher knowledge.]

Steiner, R. (1999). Drei Schritte der Anthroposophie: Philosophie, Kosmologie, Religion. Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag. [Three steps of anthroposophy: philosophy, cosmology, religion.]

Thomas, A., & Pattison, H. (2007). How children learn at home. London: Continuum.

Ullrich, H. (2008). Rudolf Steiner. London & New York: Continuum.

von Wright, M. (2007). Bildningen i gränssnittet mellan självet och världen. In B. Gustavsson (Ed.), Bildningens förvandlingar. Göteborg: Daidalos. [Bildung at the interface between self and world.]

Weaver, J., Morris, M., & Appelbaum, P. (Eds.). (2001). (Post) modern science (education). New York: Peter Lang.

Welburn, A. (2004). Rudolf Steiner's philosophy and the crisis of contemporary thought. Edinburgh: Floris Books.

Wilson, C. (2006). Phenomenology as a mystical discipline. Philosophy Now, 56, 16-19.

Wilson, F. R. (1998). The hand: How its use shapes the brain, language, and human culture. New York: Pantheon Books.

Wrathall, M. (2011). The phenomenological relevance of art. In J. D. Parry (Ed.), Art and phenomenology (pp. 9-30). London & New York: Routledge.

Zembylas, M. (2006). Science education as emancipatory: The case of Roy Bhaskar's philosophy of meta-Reality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 665-676.


Comments on this article

View all comments


...open to be different...

Other Education works in association with the following partners: http://www.othereducation.org/public/site/images/hel1/yorksj_logo_120

and is sponsored by the silence and mindfulness App Calm Me Down http://www.othereducation.org/public/site/images/hel1/google_play_icon_85

Please see copyright notice at the end of each published work for specifics.


ISSN: 2049-2162 © Other Business Ltd, 2012-2017. Other Education™ is a not-for-profit trading entity of Other Business Ltd whose registered office is: Bernard Rogers Accounting, Bank Gallery, High Street, Kenilworth. Registered in England: 08567212