Resistance and Imperfection as Educational Work: Going Against the â€œHarmonyâ€ of Individualistic Ideology
This article highlights the ideological logic of the "negative model" and its pedagogical implications. According to the 'negative model' contradiction and resistance are existential elements which embody the possibility of freedom and self realization. The negative model does not aim, as other pedagogical methods, to solve and abolish the manifestations of contradiction but rather to channel them towards a struggle for a better society and humanity. The article first part criticizes individualistic ideology's ideals of "harmony" and "self-realization" and its various positive practices of "freedom". The article second part attempts to clarify negative pedagogy's special ontological concept of humanity and liberty. In conclusion, the article seeks to clarify what are the possible ramifications of adopting the logic of negation to educational praxis while focusing on the role of public schools in it.
Adar, Z. (1975). What is Education? Jerusalem: Hebrew University, Magnes Press.
Berofsky, B. (1995). Liberation from self: A theory of personal autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bingham, C. (2008). Authority is relational: Rethinking educational empowerment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Boler, M. & M. Zembylas. (2003). Discomforting truths: The emotional terrain of understanding difference. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), Pedagogies of difference: Rethinking education for social change, (pp. 110-136). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Darom, D. (1988). Utopia and reality: Some contradictions and challenges in Kibbutz education. Communal Societies, 8, 67-76.
Dewey, J. (1990). The school and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Freire, P. (2006). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (Myra Bergman, Trans. 30th Anniversary Edition). London: Ramos.
Fromm, E. (1956). The art of loving. New York: Harper & Row.
Fromm, E. (1966). You shall be as Gods: A radical interpretation of the Old Testament and its tradition. New York: Fawcett Premier.
Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy of the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey, Inc.
Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
Gur-Ze'ev, I. (1998). Toward a non-repressive critical pedagogy. Educational Theory, 48(4), 463-486.
Hull, K. (2002). Eros and education: The role of desire in teaching and learning. The NEA Higher Education Journal, 18(Fall), 19-31.
Lamm, Z. (2000). Pressure and resistance in educationâ€”Articles and Conversations (In Hebrew). Jerusalem: Sifriat Poalim Press.
Lamm, Z. (2002). In the whirlpool of ideologiesâ€”Education in the twentieth century, ideologies and educational thought (In Hebrew). Jerusalem: Hebrew University, Magnes Press.
Lusmed, D. (1986). Why pedagogy? Screen, 27(5), 2-14.
Marcuse, H. (19911964). One-dimensional man: Studies in ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge
Marx, K. (19781848). On the Jewish Question. In R. Tucker (Ed.) The Marx-Engels Reader (pp. 26 â€“ 46). New York: Norton & Company,
McCarthy, T. (1991). Ideals and illusions: On reconstruction and deconstruction in contemporary critical theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McLaren, P. (1995). Introduction. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Postmodernism, postcolonialism and pedagogy (pp. 3-36). Albert Park, Australia: James Nicholas Publishers.
Nelson, J. L., Carlson, K. & Linton, T. F. (Eds.). (1972). Radical ideas and the schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Postman, N. (1982). The disappearance of childhood. New York: Vintage Books.
Tsabar, B. (2013). Poverty and resourcefulness: On the formative significance of eros in educational practice. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 33(1), 75-87. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11217-013-9364-5#page-1
Sartre, Jean-Paul (2007). Existentialism is a humanism. (Carol Macomber, Trans.) New Haven: Yale University Press.
Walkerdine, V. (1992). Progressive pedagogy and political struggle. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 15-24). New York: Routledge.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License of their choice (usually CCBY 3.0 unported, but determined at the proofing stage by consultation with the Editor - readers looking for copyright permissions are required to do this on a case by case basis) that allows others to share the work in some way with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. We appreciate authors placing a link to the Other Education site wherever they choose to offer a PDF download to the original OE article.