A Suitable Education?
UK law requires that all children must undergo a period of “suitable education,” provided by a school “or otherwise.” This compulsion is resourced by an increasingly complex education system of institutions. A small group of parents, however, explore and utilise educational spaces beyond, and distinct from the school to educate their children. Despite its size this group has become a matter of considerable political interest, focused on the limitations of state agents to act to ensure that a suitable education is being provided. A particular complication in this debate is the lack of a consensus on what a suitable education would look like. In this paper, I focus on framing a defensible account of a suitable education. I want to make two sets of claims. The first is that the UK State has three distinct tasks in relation to the education of children, each task places a different requirement on the action of the State and makes a different contribution to any definition of a suitable education. The second is that there is a robust theoretical debate concerning what “education” looks like. I argue that whilst this does not allow us to specify a suitable education in detail, nevertheless we can be more specific than case law presently expresses.
Alexander, H. (2007). What is common about the common school? Rational autonomy and moral agency in liberal democratic education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(4), 609-624.
Badman, G. (2009). Report to the Secretary of State on the Review of Elective Home Education in England. London: TSO.
Biesta, G.J.J. (2005). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Brighouse, H. (1995). In defense of educational equality. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 29(3), 415-420.
Davies, R. (2003). Education, virtues and the good life: An inquiry into the ability of schools to inform and motivate their students’ moral behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oxford, UK. Available from: http://www.academia.edu/823694/DPhil_Thesis_Education_Virtues_and_the_Good_life
Davies, R. (2013). After Higgins and Dunne: Imagining school teaching as a multi-practice activity. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(3), 475-490.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone/Kappa Delta Phi.
Dickens, C. (1838/1997). Oliver Twist or the parish boy’s progress. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/730/730-h/730-h.htm
DCSF. (2007). Elective home education: Guidelines for Local Authorities. London: Department for Children Schools and Families. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/288135/guidelines_for_las_on_elective_home_educationsecondrevisev2_0.pdf
Frankena, W.K. (1973). Education. In P. P. Wiener (Ed.), Dictionary of the history of ideas: Studies of selected pivotal ideas, Vol. II. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Retrieved from www.ditext.com/frankena/education.html
Gardner, P. (1993). Should we teach children to be open-minded? Or is the Pope open-minded about the existence of God?. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 32(2), 39-43.
Hare, W. (1979). Open-mindedness and education. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
Hirst, P.H. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. London: Routledge and Kogan-Paul.
Hirst, P.H. (1999). The nature of educational aims. In Marples, R. (Ed.) The aims of education (pp. 123-132). London: Routledge.
House of Commons Education Committee. (2012). Support for home education (Vols. 1 & 2). London: TSO.
Kraftl, P. (2013). Geographies of alternative education. Bristol: Policy Press.
Lees, H.E. (2013). Education without schools: Discovering alternatives. Bristol: Policy Press.
McLaughlin, T.H. (1990). Peter Gardner on religious upbringing and the liberal ideal of religious autonomy. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 24(1), 107-125.
McLaughlin, T.H. & Hare, W. (1998). Four anxieties and open-mindedness: Reassuring Peter Gardner. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 32(2), 283-292.
Monk, D. (2009). Regulating home education: Negotiating standards, anomalies and rights. Child and Family Quarterly, 21(2), 155-184.
Perry, L. (1972). Training and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 6(1), 7-29.
Peters, R.S. (1966). Ethics and education. London: Allen and Unwin.
Phenix, P.H. (1964). Realms of meaning: A philosophy of the curriculum for general education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ramaekers, S. & Suissa, J. (2012). The claims of parenting: Reasons. responsibilities and society. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Reich, R. (2002). Bridging liberalism and multiculturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reich, R. (2007). How and why to support common schooling and educational choice at the same time. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(4), 709–725.
Rousseau, J-J. (1762/2002). Emile or on education. (Trans. Fowley, B.). Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/5427/pg5427.html
Tan, C. (2004). Michael Hand, indoctrination and the inculcation of belief. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(2), 258-67.
Thomas, A. & Pattison, H. (2008). How children learn at home. London: Continuum.
Webb, S. (2011). Elective home education in the UK. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Welsh Assembly Government. (2012). Consultation document: Registering a monitoring home-based education. Cardiff: Author.
White, J. (1990). Education and the good life. London: Kogan Page.
White, J. (2006). Autonomy, human flourishing and the curriculum (review article). Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(3), 381-390.
Winch, C. (2012). Vocational and civic education: Whither British policy?. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(4), 603-18.
Winch, C. (1996). Quality and education. London: Wiley.
UN General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, 217 A (III), available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html [accessed 5 January 2015]
UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577, p. 3, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html [accessed 5 January 2015]
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License of their choice (usually CCBY 3.0 unported, but determined at the proofing stage by consultation with the Editor - readers looking for copyright permissions are required to do this on a case by case basis) that allows others to share the work in some way with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. We appreciate authors placing a link to the Other Education site wherever they choose to offer a PDF download to the original OE article.