Unstable Mixtures: Zooethnographic Educational Relations as Difference, Contagion, Critique, and Potential
Keywords:activism, indeterminacy, ethology, knowledge production, pigs
This essay approaches educational alternatives from a specific case study: an unrealised student project, designed as an unconventional ethno-graphic/ethological field study with pigs in a commercial slaughter swine facility. I begin with an interview-based account of the student’s own version of what happened with her project proposal in the process that led to its final disapproval by her university. Then I provide a speculative scenario, created as the not-yet-realised possibility of the project and outlined as if it had been carried out. In the end I discuss different meanings “education” takes on in the two accounts and ask how species-, scientific-, and ethical difference may come together as organisers of education theory and practice affecting both humans and animals. The essay suggests that an analysis ending not with conventional, evidence-based research “results,” but rather with an “unstable mixture” (Bergen, 2010) of actual events and unrealised educational possibilities, creates a space to critically rethink institutional, intersubjective, and interspecies educational relationships.
Arluke, A., & Sanders, C. R. (1996). Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bergen, V. (2010). Politics as the orientation of every assemblage. New Formations, 68(Spring), 34-41.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Despret, V. (2004). The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society, 10(2-3), 111-134.
Despret, V. (2008). The becomings of subjectivity in animal worlds. Subjectivity, 23, 123-139.
Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525-542.
Lenz Taguchi, H. (In press). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysis of interview data. Forthcoming in Feminist Theory.
May, G. H. (1996). The future is ours. Foreseeing, managing and creating the future. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Noske, B. (1997). Beyond boundaries: Humans and animals. MontrÃ©al: Black Rose Books.
Patterson, C. (2002). Eternal Treblinka: Our treatment of animals and the Holocaust. New York: Lantern Books.
Pedersen, H. (2011a). Counting affects: Mo(ve)ments of intensity in critical avian education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 14-28.
Pedersen, H. (2011b). Interlude: Zoocurriculum. In P. Segerdahl (Ed.), Undisciplined animals: Invitations to animal studies (pp. 157-158). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pedersen, H., & StÄƒnescu, V. (2012). What is â€œcriticalâ€ about animal studies? From the animal â€œquestionâ€ to the animal â€œconditionâ€. In K. Socha, Women, destruction, and the avant-garde: A paradigm for animal liberation (pp. ix-xi). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Porcher, J. (2011). The relationship between workers and animals in the pork industry: A shared suffering. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24, 3-17.
Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smuts, B. (2001). Reflektioner: Barbara Smuts [Reflections: Barbara Smuts]. In J. M. Coetzee, Djurens liv [The lives of animals] (pp. 109-124). Trans. L. GÃ¥lmark. Nora: Nya Doxa.
Wemelsfelder, F. (2003). Lives of quiet desperation. In S. J. Armstrong & R. G. Botzler (Eds.), The animal ethics reader (pp. 199-200). London and New York: Routledge.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License of their choice (usually CCBY 3.0 unported, but determined at the proofing stage by consultation with the Editor - readers looking for copyright permissions are required to do this on a case by case basis) that allows others to share the work in some way with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. We appreciate authors placing a link to the Other Education site wherever they choose to offer a PDF download to the original OE article.