The Big Other: An Offer You Can’t Refuse – or Accept, in Some Cases. Education as Onto-Theological Principle (Empire): An Anti-Manifesto
Keywords:
unthought, ontotheology, redemption, governmentality, sovereignty, education, philosophy of educationAbstract
Being increasingly puzzled by the persistence of discourses of redemption concerning education, this paper considers anew the ontological dimension. Education here is rethought in terms of governmentality, as a pervasive and invasive social technology. Far from being an essential good in need of redemption from its fallen proper “self,” in our time, I argue, education has become a means to ensure that the populations of contemporary nation states are not only closely governed but carefully formed. The history of education in modernity, the classic sociology of education and various recent educational programmes and projects are cited to show that discourses of educational salvation are, at best, mistaken about the fundamental nature of what they are addressing. The philosophy of education, since its inception, has mistakenly seen itself as an adjunct to educational policy and practice – and in the process has defaulted on its avowed mission, i.e. to be philosophical. I suggest here that thinking otherwise might be more germane, that the unexamined life might be well worth living, but that the unexamined deification of education is untenable.
References
Agamben, G. (1993). The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Althusser, L. (1977). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: New Left Books.
Althusser, L. (1984). Essays on ideology. London: Verso.
Apple, M. (1996). Cultural politics and education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Batho, G. (1989). Political issues in education. London: Cassell.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Liquid modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control. Volume I. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (1995). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bowles, Samuel & Gintis, Herbert. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Derrida, J. (1995). The gift of death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Donald, J. (1992). Sentimental education. London: Verso.
Lacan, J. (2006). Ecrits. New York: Norton.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. New York: Palgrave.
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer.
Gillborn, D. & Mirza, H. (2000). Educational inequality. Mapping race, class and gender. A synthesis of research evidence. London: Office for Standards in Education.
Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings. London: Routledge.
Heidegger, M. 1954/1977. The question concerning technology. New York: Harper & Row.
Hunter, I. (1988). Culture and government. London: Macmillan.
Hunter, I. (1994). Rethinking the school. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Jones, D. K. (1977). The making of the education system. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Lacan, J. (2006). Ecrits. New York: Norton.
Mauss, M. (2002). The gift. London: Routledge.
Nietzsche, F. (1956). The birth of tragedy and the genealogy of morals. New York: Doubleday.
Popkewitz, T. S. & Fendler, L. (Eds.). (1999). Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics. London: Routledge.
Wardle, D. (1974). Rise of the schooled society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zizek, S. (2006). The parallax view. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License of their choice (usually CCBY 3.0 unported, but determined at the proofing stage by consultation with the Editor - readers looking for copyright permissions are required to do this on a case by case basis) that allows others to share the work in some way with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. We appreciate authors placing a link to the Other Education site wherever they choose to offer a PDF download to the original OE article.